What Will Be Our Healthcare Legacy?

I was born in a country in which the government provides health care for its citizens. The nationalised system in the United Kingdom is not perfect; many people complain about it but, for the most part, people seem comfortable with the idea that their taxes go towards ensuring that nobody will lose a lifetime of savings due to illness. Since 1948 it has been considered, quite simply, part of the societal contract.  Though I’ve lived in the United States for quite some time, I’ll admit that it is still a challenge for me to comprehend that this country, one of the world’s largest industrialised nations, has a healthcare system that is based on making a profit. *…Waiting for the crowd to start screaming ‘BURN THE SOCIALIST’!! in 5…4…3…2…*

Other than knowing that all citizens can receive medical care when necessary, one of the many great things about having a long-established national healthcare plan is that it is long past time for challenges to the legality of that system to be presented. Here in the U.S., however, not only are there challenges as to whether or not the law itself (in part or as a whole) is legal but there is talk about leaders in the law-making community meeting behind the scenes with the very people who are challenging the healthcare reform law. Recently, the Supreme Corporate Court agreed to hear what is considered to be a strong challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the 2010 law that significantly overhauled the U.S. healthcare system. Whether we can agree or not on the law itself shouldn’t we all have a problem with Supreme Court justices being honoured by members of the law firm that will present the case against the ACA before the Supreme Court?

Why isn’t Justice Clarence Thomas a.k.a. Scalia’s sock puppet recusing himself from taking part in this decision?  That man is SO suspect!  Shouldn’t his wife, Ginny Thomas’ repeated  activities with her tea bag wearing friends connections be enough to cloud his decisions?  And is Justice Scalia Clarence Thomas’ puppeteer really able to be neutral in this case?  I’m sure some will say the same about Justice Elena Kagan; she worked with the Obama administration prior to her Supreme Court nomination so she was in a position to advocate for the healthcare reform law.   Fair enough – the question still stands:  How can they possibly give an unbiased opinion and determine the constitutionality of this law?

I’ll put aside, for now, how amusing it is to hear the cries of  ‘socialist!’, ‘communist!’ and ‘anti-capitalist!!’ when change is proposed by the left when those same actions taken by the right are considered good for the country.  I’ll also put aside how ridiculous it seems that we see presidential candidates who were for the insurance mandate before they ok, mostly Mitt Romney were against it.  It’s funny not “ha ha” but “ha ha hell” to see right wing loonies groups in such opposition to the health insurance mandate — knowing that they fully supported it when it was their idea.  But, back on point, right now a bigger question is why are the not so Supreme Court justices exempt from the rules of ethics in the Code of Conduct to which all other judges are subjected?  Why are they able to hobknob with people who seek to influence the Court’s decision?

What does all of this mean?  We have arrived at that fork in the road; is this country’s healthcare legacy going to be judges who work solely in support of corporate interests OK, silly question.  We knew where the conservative justices stood when they declared that corporations are people too?  Seeing justices wined and dined by law firms presenting cases to the high court doesn’t exactly give me a warm fuzzy feeling.

Supreme Court decisions have a way of leaving a lasting legacy.  This case is critical in terms of how we set the stage for providing health care in this nation going forward.  Make no mistake about it — I don’t think the ACA is perfect; I consider it a starting point.  However, should the Supreme Court decide to strike down the law it will send the strongest signal imaginable that this country is still not ready to elevate all of its citizens away from the threat of financial ruin that can occur every time there is a medical crises.  In this country we have all we need to advance the cause of healthcare AND business but we repeatedly choose to save big business — even at the expense of lives.  Are we willing to leave a legacy that shows a person’s net worth and connections are the biggest determining factors as to whether s/he has access to proper health care?


Trackbacks

  1. […] women may reflect disparities in whether and how women seek healthcare.  Early testing, early access to medical care and adherence to highly active retroviral therapy is critical for anyone who is infected with […]

  2. […] is health care in America so hard?  I don’t know much about it.  I lived in Japan for most of my adult life […]

  3. […] includes an extensive delousing and physical examination by one of Freddie Mac’s quasi-licensed physicians. In most cases, this process is completely free and take only a few […]

  4. […] of January, the Health and Human Services Department mandated that, under President Obama’s Healthcare Affordability Act, all employers and organizations who provide healthcare insurance must also cover […]

  5. […] proves that you’re too stupid to deserve one red cent from me or anybody else. I hope you wind up poor and uninsured and lose all hope of financial security over something you had no control over. Go #&$% […]

  6. […] all of our needs. Headlines state that a high percentage of families can’t afford to maintain health insurance — I have never had health insurance!  These are just small examples of how these […]

  7. […] support system that keeps many out of abject poverty; it has been tweaked over the years and the Healthcare Reform Law can be as well.  Treating it as a socialist nightmare is an argument that doesn’t hold water […]

  8. […] of choice extremists ratcheted up attacks on women’s right to choose. Personhood for an embryo? REALLY? Hey, it worked for Corporations so why not? […]

  9. Pill Popping says:

    […] pills to their patients. It’s a big business but, unfortunately, not just for those in the healthcare industry; it’s big money for many elected […]

  10. […] know the whole debate over healthcare costs? By reducing the amount we drive our cars and our dependence on coal plants, we can significantly […]

  11. […] supporting an individual mandate whereby all citizens would be required to purchase health insurance, just as all automobile owners must have car insurance, but now that President Obama has included […]

  12. […] set their sights on dismantling laws that lend themselves to women making informed decisions about their own health and what to do in the event of an unplanned or unwanted pregnancy. The rhetoric has ramped up; […]

  13. […] so-called “Obamacare” is facing a judge and jury in the form of the Supreme Court. Why? Because many on the Right still don’t seem to think that all American citizens deserve the […]

  14. […] never thought I’d have my own Sicko story to tell, but I do. In December, 2010, I noticed that my left ankle was swollen and painful. It was also […]

  15. […] of sheer foolishness we’ve been subjected to this past week. Let’s start the recap with Justice Scalia; he ought to be ashamed of himself. His statement comparing medical insurance coverage to people […]

  16. […] misled by a disingenuous GOP is nothing new. These are, after all, the same folks who deride the Affordable Care Act as socialism and a “complete government take-over of healthcare,” when anyone with a […]

  17. […] Australia, and others have been able to successfully incorporate a universal healthcare plan for their citizens, what in the world is the excuse of the United States of America that boasts so often of its […]

  18. Rumor Has It says:

    […] never stops; in 2010 there was a full out attack on healthcare reform, distorting the bill into some sort of socialist takeover before it was even written. With […]

  19. […] 28, 2012 by Brooklyn Dame Leave a Comment Today the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favour of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as “Obamacare”. Surprisingly, Chief Justice John Roberts sided with […]

  20. […] all the statistics that you NEED to know about medical debt in the United States and why healthcare reform is so […]