Free Exchange of Ideas…No More?

Image: PublicDomainVectors

Like many of you, I spend a lot of time on the internet. Yes, I know it can be the ultimate time-waster but I also know that nothing like it exists in terms of access to an entire world of information at my fingertips. Like any other place from which I can gather data I always consider the source. I don’t take everything printed online as gospel because I know a lot of batshit crazy people with an agenda post online but I like knowing information is available for me to sift through when it is needed.

The beauty of the internet is the depth and breadth of this resource, and both the speed and ease at which information can be obtained. If things continue along the course they’ve taken recently in the Senate, in the not so distant future we’ll look back and realise we should have said ‘Enjoy it while you can‘!

Last year, Congress voted on and passed the ‘Protect IP (Intellectual Property) Act’. This act is part of the Stop Online Piracy Act which is supported by groups as powerful as the Motion Picture Association that are concerned about the losses they suffer due to poaching of intellectual property. Losing control over the product of ones own labour is a legitimate concern for artists and other creative professionals. Passage of this Act seems reasonable until you scratch beneath the surface which you should always do when big business, a bunch of corporate-owned politicians, and their lobbyists are involved and see that the remedy to cure piracy is looking far worse than the disease.

Congress sped through the passage of this bill faster than Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich go through women, which isn’t surprising given how many millions of dollars have been spent by people corporations lobbyists who skew the political process in support of it. Why are they so anxious to have this Act pass? Because some corporations want to squash the internet as it is in its current state. If the Act passes in the Senate, corporations will have the ability to use the law to ensure that government wipes websites out of existence — simply by complaining that those sites contain copyrighted information. The world wide web would no longer be a place to freely exchange ideas and information.

When the Senate votes on this bill, the outcome could be the end of the internet as we have come to know it. From my vantage point, the last thing I want is for corporations to have even more control over the information to which we have access. Think about it; it’s bad enough there are organisations such as Fake FOX News *shudder* that lie like hell manipulate  information.  Giving more organisations the ability to control what we see, hear and read sets a very dangerous precedent. Make your voice heard; let your elected officials know that you don’t want corporations controlling more than they already do like many of our elected officials.

For another point of view:


  1. Good evening ~

    I was referred to your site from a common facebook associate, Harry Mena. As i read the first paragraphs regarding the virtually endless resource that is the internet, I referred back to a quote I read earlier in the day that I think you may find viscerally associated with the theme of your post. It reads like this:

    “One thing I actively work on, and have been actively working on for sometime, is maintaining a non-reactive mode of working. Fortunately, or unfortunately, as technology continues its steady advance promising “convenience”, I believe it’s not really a convenience which it delivers. Rather, it’s a shortening of a distance between thought and action. If I’m not careful, this can lead to a more reactive way of working – checking email, twitter, and the like reflexively.

    People have grown through a period of time where thought had more opportunity to gestate, merge, form, crystallize, and otherwise before it would eventually manifest as intention. Now, as that distance has shortened, we are delivered a new problem in that we have to devise new methods of holding onto our thoughts, working through them, and eventually delivering them in ways that require holding off the natural inclination of acting upon opportunity.

    Just because I can search for an answer to a question instantly, doesn’t mean I should. Simply resting my mind on a question and letting thoughts meander can deliver some pretty cool ideas. But when I instantly search for an answer, I can actually deprive myself of those new concepts that can only come from a period of thought.

    The iPhone, other smart phones, and apps and programs in general, are just tools. Like any other, I need to continue learning how to use them, especially as their nature is to change. So, I guess a better answer to the question is “Too many, but the iPhone is still very useful. I continue trying to learn an optimal use.”

    The guy who said it for a Tech Blog interview is named Kourosh Dini.

    Obvious it is that news blogging required a good balance of facts and speed in order to stay ahead of the curve feeding the news-cycle, but nonetheless there is something to be said for a mind-brake mechanism, no?

    I enjoyed perusing your posts and will return with some (hopefully) good retorts.

    Cordially yours,

    Dardin E. Soto

    • Brooklyn Dame says

      Welcome to the borderless side of the news, Mr. Soto! Thanks for the commentary. We are in agreement; the internet is endless and that means, in my opinion, it’s more important than ever to actively engage one’s own mind and seek a variety of valid/tested/proven sources for data that we can turn into useful information.

      In the end, it’s up to each person to decide what s/he wants to filter out but, the main point is that corporations with a vested interested in controlling what we hear/see should not be allowed to make those decisions for us. We need to keep the exchange of ideas free and accessible.


  1. […] Washington, it is encouraging to see people rising up collectively to force Congress to suspend an anti-piracy law decision and also to bring a large organization to it’s knees in the course of a […]

  2. […] the policy preview page, it talks about the type of information they collect, how they use the information, transparency and choice, accessing and updating your information, information they share, […]

  3. […] politics and news because they make a conscious effort to get their news elsewhere including the internet and […]

  4. […] VOA plays an important role throughout much of the world. In countries with government-sanctioned media repression, such as China and Iran, it is reverently regarded as a vital source of information, a lifeline to the truth. The Dalai Lama has said that the collective spirit of the Tibetan people is lifted during a VOA broadcast. In some technologically disadvantaged countries where AM and short-wave radio are still the main media outlets, VOA is the alpha and omega of information sources. […]

  5. […] constitutional grounds and the provisions of the treaty.  ACTA is noted be to more stringent than SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act — which was about copyrighted material) in that ACTA, if ratified, […]

  6. […] SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act about copyrighted material that, if passed, would have allowed the […]