Mississippi Yearning

Image: PublicDomainVectors.org

Many of those ‘vacation with us in the Gulf Coast‘ commercials have been airing lately. Perhaps those ads are appearing so frequently at this time of the year because many people are on a holiday break; after all, what better time to think about a prospective vacation than when currently enjoying one?

The ads are part of a big push to bring in crowds to enjoy all the Gulf Coast offers. The ads’ sponsor, British Petroleum (BP), notes on their website that they’re “working to foster economic restoration throughout the Gulf Coast, with special emphasis on two of the region’s most impacted industries: tourism and seafood”.  That’s niceand so they should; their role in causing damage to both tourism and seafood in Mississippi, Louisiana and the rest of that region has been well documented.

So why would Republicans start gearing up for (yet another) fight against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)?  One would think that in light of the environmentally damaging oil spill last year from with the entire Gulf Coast is still recovering, any action towards ensuring clean air and safe water would be supported. Unfortunately, not so; the Republicans are not convinced that we need protection from arsenic and mercury in our air and water supplies so they’re pushing for a law that will tie the EPA’s hands. Their goal is to ensure that the EPA doesn’t have the ability to limit mercury pollution. *Rolling my eyes…*

Republicans claim that there are already too many regulations and that they serve no purpose but to harm businesses and curb job growth. Apparently, any study citing that protection of the environment leads not only to better overall health for area residents that seems like common sense but, these days, common sense isn’t all that common has no credibility where the Party of NO (improvement) is concerned — but neither does any study citing job growth as industries retrofit their environmentally damaging outdated machinery.

Citizens need to speak up about this; shouldn’t this be a simple issue? Must the resistance of big business to change with the times and do what’s right always be supported by the GOP? Health be damned, it’s about whatever the corporations want.

Whatever happened to the party of conservation? From where I’m sitting, they seem to be missing in action.


  1. […] process of mountaintop removal (MTR) for years, asking Congress to ban the practice and the Environmental Protection Agency to deny coal companies blasting permits. Numerous acts of civil disobedience, including tree sits, […]

  2. […] was a record high year for disasters: Hurricane Irene, a blizzard, the floods in Mississippi and the wildfires in Texas. Not to mention hundreds of tornadoes including the Joplin, Missouri […]

  3. […] Just when I think he can’t get any lower he sinks below even my lowest (negative) expectations of him.  What’s my problem with him (this time)?  He’s using a hurricane — a circumstance outside of anyone’s control unlike the economic meltdown caused by his corporate masters and aided/abetted by Congress – as the time to decide that more budget cuts are needed, particularly to emergency services.   Mr. “‘Heck of a job’, Brownie” agrees that now is the time to kick people when they’re down; given his response to those who were suffering as Hurricane Katrina ravaged New Orleans during his tenure, his support for Mr. Cantor is not surprising.  Right now, Cantor’s on par with the sludge remaining from the clean-up necessitated by Hurricane Irene. […]

  4. […] was trying to limit people’s resources with his attack on global warming.  As if saving the environment is an attack on the losers who wrecked it to begin […]

  5. […] the amount we drive our cars and our dependence on coal plants, we can significantly reduce our air pollution and save lives. The whole act of saving lives has a side benefit of reducing respiratory illness […]

  6. […] xenophobia, racism and homophobia. Add a pinch of extreme weather (tornadoes, droughts, floods, hurricanes) caused by climate […]

  7. Rumor Has It says:

    […] might find it “disingenuous” that President Obama mention God in a speech following the BP oil spill in 2010 because he “does not go to church on a regular […]