No Free Speech In School

A high school Biology class is learning about genetics and cell research.  The class has already covered the memorization parts about terms and procedures, and have done punnett squares and other problems to be able to apply their new knowledge.

Their teacher has now had them read articles about bioethics in regard to patient consent in “donating” cells.  The class is scheduled to have an in-depth discussion surrounding the validity of using cells for research without the knowledge of the “donor” when a parent finds out and reports the teacher to the principal for introducing controversial topics in the classroom.

Surprisingly, the teacher is told she cannot hold the discussion because it may result in some students feeling bullied if they do not agree with the majority or it may dip into a territory some families don’t morally believe in and do not want their students exposed to in the classroom.

Sadly, this isn’t just a made up story.  Teachers all over the United States are being told that they need to avoid controversial topics in their classrooms with district-mandated policies.

As an educator, this disturbs me.

How do we teach classes like Current Events or history or literature without asking our students to critically think about controversial subjects?

One of the biggest complaints about secondary education by colleges, universities, and businesses is that students are not arriving with the thinking skills that are acceptable for the higher level thinking that is required of them for furthering their education or handling a career.

State standards call for teachers to teach to the highest levels of learning, which, according to Bloom’s Taxonomy, are Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation.

In the instance of the Biology class, students first have to remember what punnett squares are, understand how they are used by scientists, and then solve some of their own.  If they can do this, they are only halfway up Bloom’s in their learning.  Yet this is where many parents and school boards would like the learning to stop. Not because they don’t want kids to learn critical thinking, but because this is where “safe” learning ends.

In order to achieve the higher learning–the problem solving and critical thinking skills we want our students to bring with them into adulthood–teachers have to push beyond the bottom half of Bloom’s.  They need to get the kids thinking and talking and creating.  They need to push the students to think beyond their own beliefs.

Some school districts, like this one in Minnesota, are trying to create policies that make everyone happy.  The re-do of the Anoka-Hennepin School District’s policy comes after six students committed suicide in two years because teachers could not conduct classroom discussions that included anti-bullying in regards to homosexuals.

But will a reworked policy be enough?

Teachers are constantly told they need to watch what they say in the classroom…to not be too controversial. History has shown educators that if what they say/teach can be construed as trying to push their own agenda?  They could lose their jobs.

So what do we do?

Teach to the standards that we know our students need…

…or play it safe and therefore have unprepared students?


Comments

  1. Eric Storch says

    I’m not an educator and this just really gets to me. I see it everyday with my own children – they have no problem solving or thinking skills! I try to teach them the “other side” or “alternative” things to what they learn in school, but they’re already brainwashed into thinking that what a teacher says is law. My kids argue with me about things that are taught!

    Gah! I shake a metaphorical fist at this BS and hope someday my kids will open their minds and realize there’s more to things that what is taught in a classroom.

  2. It really makes me angry that so many people get angry over their children hearing of other viewpoints. It’s okay if they think differently than you do. I promise.

Trackbacks

  1. […] had two pieces this week at Borderless News and Views: No Free Speech in Schools and My Invitation to Rick […]

  2. […] Goh, Singaporean elementary school teacher, freelance writer and mom of three who is passionate about parenting and educating kids. In her […]

  3. […] to “free speech” which includes the right to speak up and out against our government and anything else we feel strongly about. There is often talk of the mainstream media’s “liberal […]

  4. […] don’t know why I was so possessed by this. I am a teacher who not just embraces technology in the classroom as a way to get the kids more engaged, but […]

  5. […] to advocate for change. Am I appalled by unmanned drone strikes? Yes. Am I astounded that I can express that opinion freely and unfettered? Also, yes. Because we have all of the benefits this country has given us, like […]

  6. […] — let alone everyone — to shut up about it on the basis of claims of discrimination or that his freedom of speech is being tread upon.  If that is the bed you made by your actions, then you are going to have to […]

  7. […] teachers and students are beginning to have to worry about what they will have the legal right to respectfully teach and be taught.  This is where it’s time for the line to finally be drawn, especially since […]