Stealing From the Hungry

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.

~  Dwight D. Eisenhower

When President Eisenhower spoke those words he was correct. If he were alive today and able to speak those same words to his own party, he would be wasting his breath. Making sense doesn’t allow one to become popular in today’s GOP; ask Jon Hunstman about that. But Eisenhower, having lived through the economic devastation of the Great Depression, was quite familiar with the need for both pragmatism and compassion — such as that which was warranted when he expanded the Social Security system.

Eisenhower’s concern was two-pronged: focus on unnecessary spending — such as that which is lobbied for by the military industrial complex — and don’t neglect those among us who are unable to care for themselves. Today’s Republican party doesn’t take his approach; while planning moves to block the Buffett Rule‘s  proposed millionaire’s tax increase, House Republicans have simultaneously moved to cut food stamps and other benefits for millions of people in need. The Republican (Ryan) budget, fully supported by candidate Mitt Romney, purports to save over $33 billion over 10 years — $14 billion less than the amount the Buffett Rule would have produced.

When it is a matter of feeding people no budget cut is deep enough. U.S. Representative Frank Lucas (R-OK, and Chair of the Agriculture Committee) said, “It’s tightening things up. It’s reflecting the budgetary times we are in.” However, when it’s a matter of raising revenues that would minimally impact the wealthiest 1% the GOP bleats and balks. Their claim is that  whatever the amount, any tax increase represents an amount that is too high when that contribution comes from the wallets of the wealthy. Additionally, an increase on the wealthy makes no sense because $47 billion is “virtually no money” and, therefore, wouldn’t have an impact.

Just. Plain. Foul.

According to Feeding America, hunger exists for one in six people in this country. With tight budgets, funding for food and shelter has been cut around the nation — but $47 billion could feed a lot of people. The Food Stamp Program (also known as the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program) provides support to families, the elderly and the disabled. When America’s economic recession officially began in December of 2007, food stamp use skyrocketed and has since increased by approximately 70%.

It is for these types of programs that public sector intervention is needed; government programs are certainly not perfect but we cannot be so foolish as to expect that charitable or religious institutions can pick up the slack. Nor can we expect that the private sector will take on supplemental nutrition programs or anything else that doesn’t contribute to their bottom line. The Romney plan is devastating; even the bishops of the Catholic Church noted that the budget submitted by devout Cafeteria Catholic, Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI), fails a morality test.  Repeat. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops says this is immoral…and they know a few things about immorality… 

Under President Eisenhower, the highest marginal income tax rate was 91%. The economy grew. Nobody is even remotely suggesting returning to the days of a 91% rate — but are we, as a nation, willing to return to the days of bread lines?  It’s time to separate the mean-spirited and batshit crazy from everyone else.

And, in the meantime, as for the poor? Oh, I know…Let ’em eat cake.



Image Source: Social Security Online History Pages


  1. Interesting article? I wonder were this country would be if our founding fathers felt as your do about the military? Probably wouldn’t be a bill of rights or constitution. I believe were the real money is being spent is in video games, computers, cell phones and information technology. You might want to re-evaluate. When people spend $80 billion over a weekend on a new video game it makes me wonder where our priorities are. Definitely not food!

    • Brooklyn Dame says

      Try looking at the national budget. There is a ton of money for national defense that is being wasted. Planes and weapons are being built for the support of the military industrial complex that have absolutely nothing to do with food. Additionally, WWII is over. Can you rationalise and justify why this country is spending so much money to maintain bases in countries that are not a threat and haven’t been so for over 50 years? It’s a matter of priorities; there is money to pay for food and not have to cut programs that take care of the neediest people in this country (particularly if everyone, including corporations, is paying his/her fair share).

  2. I believe were the real money is being spent is in video games, computers, cell phones and information technology. Thanks for sharing this with us.

  3. I believe were the real money is being spent is in video games, computers, cell phones and information technology.

  4. I do not even know the way I finished up right here, however I assumed this submit was once good. I do not understand who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger should you aren’t already. Cheers!


  1. […] then my homophobic, Lutheran, devoutly Republican father friended my husband on Facebook. In a matter of days he was showing distinct signs of […]

  2. […] still thought they had a shot at beating Mitt Romney. So they played dodge ball — transparent culture war dodge ball. The media ate it up like candy. Suddenly the jobs reports were old news. Higher than […]

  3. […] are slipping out of the middle class and into poverty. The chilling fact is that there are more people in poverty today than at any time since the New […]

  4. […] easy way to pay for these cuts? Enact the Buffett rule, which is projected to add $36 billion in annual tax revenues to the federal budget.  The premise of the Buffett rule is […]

  5. […] of them all, the war machine. Yes, the Military Industrial Complex. This insatiable beast that President Eisenhower warned us about in his farewell address. But even he, I’m sure, didn’t fathom the enormity to […]

  6. […] as “proof” that our 16th President had much in common with today’s Conservative agenda. President Obama and Progressives are called socialists for attempting to find ways to assist and […]

  7. […] receive care and somebody still has to pay for it. People who don’t have enough money for adequate food and housing still gotta eat, and still need shelter. And someone will pay for it – through the normal […]

  8. […] Representative Paul Ryan’s budget – filled with tax cuts for the rich and deep, brutal cuts to programs for the poor, including food stamps, school lunches, and more […]

  9. […] different. Maybe Tim Pawlenty isn’t nearly as dull in 140 characters as he is in real life. Maybe Paul Ryan will amaze with his ability to spell budget or Medicaid. Perhaps Marco Rubio will tweet in Spanish, […]

  10. […] themselves, repeat anything said on Fox News, and complain about how all of their money is spent helping poor people. For those who really don’t understand how wealth happens, this is a formula for […]

  11. […] economics: a small minority with a disproportionately large piece of the pie to start with keeps breaking off more pie for themselves, treating every ‘hood they set foot in like a game of Monopoly. Just as Giuliani “cleaned up” […]

  12. […] by Brooklyn Dame Leave a Comment In light of Mitt Romney’s announcement that this guy, Paul Ryan, is his choice for VP, we thought we’d show you “These Guys” — the people […]

  13. […] and me) out of work and on the street. Cardboard boxes become the new apartment in America, with soup kitchens feeding a large percentage of the population. Looting and rioting become the order of the […]

  14. […] breathe easier at the thought of Mitt becoming president. They’ll be free to ship more money to tax shelters overseas and pocket even more of the global financial […]

  15. […] 1956 President Eisenhower refused to go along with Britain, France and Israel when they wanted to take control of the Suez […]

  16. […] to his senses, he said, ‘How many of my father’s hired men have food to spare, and here I am starving to death! 18 I will set out and go back to my father and say to him: Father, I have sinned against heaven […]