How Reagan Sold The United States Piece By Piece

One thing that the libertarians are extremely good at is channeling the anger at Democrats for the Republican misdeeds. The methodology is rather simple and this is how it works.

  1. Take any action where the government made a big boo-boo!
  2. Keep talking about the mistake and how that mistake would not have happened if there was no government.
  3. The job is almost done when (2) is established since it is well known that every Libertine and a large section of Republicans are against government interference.
  4. Convert people’s mistrust of government into support for Republicans.


Take the recent racist super bowl ad; this advertisement is an excellent example of Republicans selling their country and blaming it on Democrats. No one denies that there is some truth behind the accusations; Americans jobs are getting outsourced, it is not a fair competition, and some countries are getting richer at America’s expense. The question is why blame it on Democrats?  After all, was it not Ronald Reagan who started the process of selling this country?

It was Reagan who echoed Ayn Rand‘s philosophy that one who is poor is also lazy and one who is lazy is poor as well. Unemployment rates reached double digits during his presidency. The gap between rich and poor increased under his watch and it was his policies that essentially led to the stock market crash of 1987. While rightly complaining that excessive government interference leads to misallocation of resources, Reaganomics conveniently forgets that excessive reliance on private markets leads to misallocation in the form of large-scale speculation. Speculations and get rich quick schemes become the way of life — exactly how the excesses of Wall Street we see today began under Reagan.

It is not a coincidence that China’s progress started during Reagan presidency. It was Reagan who started the process of deregulation that ultimately resulted in American jobs being outsourced all over the world and, a by the end of his era, there was a large increase in crappy jobs for Americans.

It’s not only China; when I look back on my child hood in India, I remember wealth flowing into the country at a rapid pace after 1980. From more than a dozen people living in three rooms, my extended family went to an apartment per family member within 20 years. Imagine this, and we are not even rich, we are still middle class. This growth was certainly not reciprocated in United States?

Here is the most annoying fact: it was Reagan who legitimized deficit spending. It is under Reagan’s watch that the US deficit ballooned from $997 billion to $2.85 trillion dollars — more than all prior presidents combined. It is preposterous to ignore the origins of the issue and blame the sorry state of affairs on Democrats.

The next time Republicans talk about deficits and outsourced jobs, ask them to look at the Reagan era and, hopefully, the sensible ones will realize the folly of their actions.



  1. You’ve got at least one key piece of information backwards. It wasn’t deregulation that drove the trend in offshoring. That “ultimate result” took place under Clinton, after he had variously enacted or expanded various pieces of regulation and their associated agencies: NAFTA, OSHA, FMLA. It was after this that the tech offshoring phenomenon began. (And the unskilled outsourcing phenomenon is of course decades older than Reagan’s term. You’re simply blaming the wrong person. Deliberately, I suspect.)

    The fact of the matter is that regulation, much like high taxes, provides an incentive for corporations to hire overseas. This is quite simply because regulation increases the difficulty and expense of employing people. The converse is also true: deregulation eases these burdens, removing the incentive to hire offshore.

    So no, deregulation does not cause offshoring. Regulation does.

    But I’ll entertain any reasonable, detailed argument you can lay out to the contrary.


    • Yes, and here is where republicans idiocracy starts to baffle me… Clinton indeed signed much of it into law, but reagan and bush sr where the developers of all that crap you mentioned. its similar to balming obamas high unemployment numbers and defecit on bushs economy and trend of increased spending.

  2. Chris Watts says

    Reagan started the process of deregulation ? Are you kidding us ?

    Carter deregulated the airline industry and the trucking industry, the greatest blow to the union movement ever in the United States,.


  1. […] radical social change, to become politically-active citizens” What concerned Alinsky was the “middle class…driven to a right-wing viewpoint.  Making them ripe for the plucking by some guy…promising a […]

  2. Pill Popping says:

    […] those remedies may not apply if the setback is something like losing a job or watching endless GOP debates and caucuses; that can throw any sane person into the throes of depression. But now, aside […]

  3. […]  These batshit crazy thugs have raised the debt ceiling many times in the past (18 times under Ronald Reagan, 8 under Clinton and 7 times under George W. Bush) so their timing and this situation just stinks […]

  4. […] mess that we’re clawing our way out of was created long ago, particularly when the nation was sold piece by piece. It’s up to all of us to clean up the mess — and in order to do that we must correct […]

  5. […] have) resources to fight back…so they often have no voice.  It’s the people in the middle — who are increasingly moving towards the bottom — who seem to need some convincing […]

  6. […] that when President Obama is very direct with the American people, “Repunditcans” and GOP candidates still offer their interpretation of whatever he says.  Clearly the  President does not stutter, […]

  7. […] of people who defy the Mormon archetype. An archetype that Romney – a clean-cut, white, Republican family man – embodies. The ad campaign aims to paint the LDS in a “normal” light, […]

  8. […] about Ronald Reagan, no one can deny that he made a hell of a promoter-in-chief. But he also made a hell of a shambles of the […]

  9. […] folks to make the right choice, we could call it the Reagan Rule instead of the Buffett Rule.” Reagan taxed the 1% at a 28.4% rate, which is similar to the 30% rate the Buffet Rule proposes. In fact, […]

  10. […] they affect us. This isn’t about inciting class warfare: the wealthy already set the ball rolling when Reagan started cutting taxes in the 80s and put an end to the economic prosperity this country enjoyed since WWII. This is about […]

  11. […] convert Hitler from the dark side. Even my hawkish roommate dared to utter the five magic words of Ronald Regan: you don’t negotiate with […]

  12. […] start with the GOP’s diety, Ronald Reagan. Retroactively, Ronnie’s sabotage of the Iranian hostage crisis negotiations never happened. […]

  13. […] that as president, Romney would merely be a high-defense-spending, moderate, realist in the mold of Ronald Reagan or George H.W. Bush. It’s hard to realistically picture him as one truly in the camp of Paul […]

  14. […] recently, the former Reagan administration advisor has been on a ludicrous campaign to “educate” the public about President […]

  15. […] today? October 4, 2012 by Julie Driscoll Leave a Comment Conservatives constantly quote Ronald Reagan, as though his soaring deficit and high unemployment numbers never existed, or Ayn Rand, as though […]

  16. […] Yes it was. Corprapist plundering that was encouraged by NAFTA and outsourcing. Your heroes both Georges and Reagan were in favor of outsourcing. It started with Ronny and ended with GWB. How Reagan Sold The United States Piece By Piece […]